When the Cold War ended, ideology lost its organizing function. A shift away from the debate of capitalism vs. socialism to a unipolar world led by the US-centric international system. Today, history is repeating itself, not as tragedy or farce but as strategic redesign. One nation in particular has quietly refined the fundamentals of global power in the 21st Century – and it’s not China.
Russia’s most potent export to the world isn’t oil or arms. It’s a new political vocabulary. Moscow’s strategic think tanks now speak of a “civilizational world.”
For the Global South, this framing is liberating. The idea of cultural pluralism against Western universalism is liberating for the Global south, where each pole – whether it’s Western liberalism, Chinese techno-authoritarianism, Islamic conservatism or Russian Eurasianism – represents a unique historical-cultural model.
This concept of giving respect to diverse civilization values gives multipolarity moral depth. Today multipolarity is not an aspiration but an operating reality.
For the West, that’s disorienting. But for Moscow, it’s a smart way to simultaneously restrain China’s hegemonic rise and block America’s restoration of primacy. A pivot to claim moral leadership for the Global South without claiming empire.
Moscow has transformed multipolarity from an academic theory into a geopolitical operating system. Most nations speak of multipolarity as inevitability; Russia treats it as a managed process. The Kremlin understands that the 21st century’s defining struggle is not democracy versus autocracy but control of interdependence.
Latest stories
Critical industries, critical risks in ASEAN supply chains
A familiar quiet: Prabowo and the return of managed dissent
New weapons emerging to counter and zap drone power
A power broker in regional interdependenceInterdependence has emerged as one of the most decisive factors in current geopolitics. In the 21st century, power is no longer defined through military might, economic weight and technological sophistication. But a nation that understands the regional dynamics can place it’s presence so structurally that no major decision can be taken without its consent.
This is what happened in 2022 when, on the Ukraine issue, Western countries raised sanctions intended to cripple Russia. They hardly thought that it would instead transform a theory (multi-polarity) from paper into practicality – a realignment from current world order.
In 2025, over 70% of Russian trade had reoriented toward Asia and the Global South. Moscow has turned economic isolation into leverage. It’s situated right at the frontier between fast growing Asia and security conscious Eurasia. So, Russia isn’t trying to control the world. It has simply made itself too important to ignore.
For Beijing, Russia is crucial because it provides energy and helps secure China’s northern border. For New Delhi, Russia serves as a diplomatic bridge between India and China, a major power trusted by both. For Middle Eastern nations, it provides weapons, helps stabilize energy prices and offers veto protection in UN security. For Europe, Russia is still a major energy source despite political hostility.
Geography gives Russia an advantage by making it a transcontinental country that links Asia and Europe, while also sharing land borders with 14 sovereign countries.
Today Moscow becomes the irreplaceable broker in every regional equation. Almost every regional player – whether it’s China, India, Iran, Germany or even Venezuela – needs Russia for something: energy, weapons or political backing.
A country thrives in instabilityBecause Russia thrives on systemic resilience. When its systems come under stress, it adapts, finding ways to remain relevant and strong. While other countries struggle under global pressures, Russia doesn’t even flinch.
When targeted by economic sanctions from the West, Russia bypassed SWIFT and developed its own financial infrastructure, including SPFS and MIR Payment. Targeted by the West’s energy sanctions, Russia turned to new partners such as China and India,
A recent instance arose when the Ukraine conflict pressured the United States to consider supplying long‑range Tomahawk missile cruise missiles. Putin’s announcement of successful tests for the Burevestnik nuclear cruise missile and Poseidon, a nuclear‑powered unmanned underwater drone, signaled more than technological bragging. It reintroduced nuclear novelty as negotiation.
Sign up for one of our free newsletters
- The Daily Report Start your day right with Asia Times' top stories
- AT Weekly Report A weekly roundup of Asia Times' most-read stories
In an era of missile defenses, hypersonic interceptors, and AI warfare, Russia’s message is: No defense is absolute. The consequence? Strategic humility returns. The United States and NATO, once confident in deterrence dominance, are forced back into dialogue mode. Russia wields military influence with surgical precision. It thrives not in stability but in managing instability.
Today Russia is positioning itself as the most indispensable shock absorber of the multipolar world. In effect, Russia has weaponized endurance: it does not seek stability but thrives in managing instability.
By 2030, global power will be defined by these systems: energy corridors, currency systems (dollar vs. BRICS) and information networks, media and AI driven. Russia’s grand strategy is to be a swing power in each.
Moscow’s ultimate aim is not to rule the world, but to make it unruleable by anyone else. Ironically, this may represent the true definition of multipolarity in the 21st century. While the US was the architect of the unipolar world, Russia is undoubtedly the true architect of the multipolar world order.
Sign up here to comment on Asia Times stories
Sign in with Google Or Sign up Sign in to an existing account
Thank you for registering!
An account was already registered with this email. Please check your inbox for an authentication link.
Ravi Kant
Ravi Kant is a columnist and correspondent for Asia Times covering Asia. He mainly writes on economics, international politics and technology. He has wide experience in the financial world and some of his research and analyses have been quoted by the US Congress, Harvard University and Wikipedia ( Chinese Dream). He is also the author of the book Coronavirus: A Pandemic or Plandemic.
More by Ravi Kant